reason codes/visa

Visa 10.4

other fraud — card-absent environment

The cardholder told their bank they did not authorise or take part in an online or phone transaction.

30 days to respond under Visa rules

Count your days left

network
Visa
code
Visa 10.4
dispute type
other fraud — card-absent environment
response window
30 days
decisive exhibits
3 of 6
who submits
you, under your own name

What the issuer is asking

Visa is not asking whether the charge was real. It is asking you to prove this cardholder took part in it.

Everything that proves identity or use counts. Everything that only proves the order exists does not.

An AVS and CVV match helps but never settles 10.4 on its own — those checks pass for anyone holding the card details.

filing window

The cardholder normally has 120 days from the transaction date to file.

Your processor states its own deadline on the notice, usually shorter than the 30 days above. That printed date is the one that binds you. Work to it.

The exhibits Visa 10.4 turns on

6 exhibits · 3 decisive

Decisive exhibits can answer this code on their own. Supporting exhibits are worth attaching and never worth relying on.

  1. 01

    Proof of delivery to the AVS-matched address

    Carrier record naming the address that passed AVS. A signature or a photo at the door is stronger again.

    decisive
  2. 02

    Two prior undisputed transactions

    Visa's compelling evidence 3.0 route, live since 15 April 2023. Two earlier orders by the same person, the oldest at least 120 days before this one, sharing two of: IP address, device ID, login ID, shipping address.

    decisive
  3. 03

    Evidence the goods or service were used

    Login timestamps, download logs, licence activation, seat used, session recorded. Use is participation.

    decisive
  4. 04

    The authorisation record

    AVS result, CVV result, 3-D Secure result, IP address, device fingerprint, and the exact timestamp.

    strong
  5. 05

    Order confirmation and invoice

    Establishes what was sold and for how much. It does not prove who bought it.

    supporting
  6. 06

    The cardholder email thread

    Any message from the cardholder's own address about this order is participation evidence.

    supporting

Arguments that carry weight

  • yesDelivery to an address the cardholder has used before, evidenced by the carrier.
  • yesThe account that placed the order also placed earlier orders that were never disputed.
  • yesThe digital product was accessed from the same IP address or device as an earlier undisputed order.
  • yesThe cardholder emailed you about the order before filing.

Arguments that lose this code

  • noAn AVS and CVV match with nothing else attached.
  • noA screenshot of your own admin panel showing the order, and no delivery record.
  • noDelivery to an address the cardholder has never been linked to.
  • noAn argument about the cardholder's honesty rather than about the evidence.

the common misreading

Visa 10.4 is not a claim that you did something wrong

It is a claim about identity. Arguing that the order was legitimate answers a question nobody asked. Prove the person, not the purchase.

You know what to prove. The file is the part that takes a week.

Upload the notice and everything you already hold. You get a dated timeline, a rebuttal argued against Visa 10.4 and numbered exhibits, as one PDF.

Single case — €39 · Five-pack — €79

Build the file

Free until you see your own file.
No account, no password, ever.